Why would a dog trainer whose philosophies and methods promote humane and force-free training use "
Negative Punishment"?. What kinds of nasty and unpleasant thoughts come to mind when you think about that phrase? Before you get too carried away with that, are you sure about its actual definition?
There are a lot of words and phrases that can mean different things to different people, and of course there are even different ways to put emphasis on words and phrases that can make a difference in how they are interpreted. The world of dog training and behaviour is certainly not exempt from this.
To properly work in the training and the behaviour modification of any species, one needs to have an understanding of the science of learning and the science of behaviour. In science, the definition of words is (for obvious reasons) much more exacting and rigid than in common speech, so this can cause confusion and concern when certain words are used 'scientifically' by one person but interpreted 'commonly' by another person.
From my experience, the most common example of this is with the definition of the four quadrants of Operant Conditioning. Very disappointingly I have also experienced no small number of 'trainers' who use these phrases incorrectly (which tells you about the state of the dog training industry):
> Positive Reinforcement
> Negative Reinforcement
> Positive Punishment
> Negative Punishment
The biggest misunderstanding is in the use of the words Positive and Negative. In common language we associate the word 'positive' as an equivalent to words such as 'good' and 'pleasant', and we associate the word 'negative' as an equivalent of words such 'bad' and 'unpleasant'. When used in Operant Conditioning however, these two words have a different meaning but one that we're still very familiar with because we've all used in in another science called Mathematics:
> Positive = To add, or introduce.
> Negative = To remove, or take away.
Now for the final two words:
> Reinforcement = To increase the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated.
> Punishment = To decrease the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated.
So now that we've got all the definitions laid out, let's have another look at "Negative Punishment" and see just how cruel and nasty it is. By definition, Negative Punishment means to 'take away' something in order 'to decrease the likelihood of a behaviour being repeated'. An example of this?
Let's say I've got a dog whose greeting behaviour is too boisterous for my liking. If I determine that the motivation for my dog's behaviour is to get attention, and then I do in fact provide my dog with the attention she seeks, I am applying Positive Reinforcement and actually rewarding my dog for the behaviour I don't like.
Instead, what I need to do is to show my dog that her boisterous greeting behaviour will not get her the attention she is seeking, so I will not give her any attention until she settles down to the extent where I can
then reward her with my attention. I will remove (remove = negative) my attention to decrease the likelihood (punishment) of the behaviour being repeated.
.